Islamabad, Oct 5 (PTI) Imran Khan on Thursday approached the Islamabad High Court (IHC) seeking
suspension of the trial court’s verdict in the Toshakhana corruption case more than a month after it
suspended the jailed former prime minister’s three-year sentence for concealing details of state gifts,
according to a media report.
Khan, 70, was arrested on August 5, 2023, and shifted to Attock jail after a court sentenced him to three
years in prison in the Toshakhana (national treasury gifts) graft case. The trial court in Islamabad had
found the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief guilty of “corrupt practices” in the Toshakhana case.
The Supreme Court later acknowledged “procedural defects” in Khan’s conviction by the trial court.
After his sentence in the Toshakhana case was suspended by the IHC, the government detained the PTI
chief in the cipher case for allegedly violating the Official Secrets Act by disclosing a cable sent by the
country’s embassy in Washington last year in March. He has since remained behind bars on judicial
remand, which has been extended until October 10.
On September 26, Khan was shifted to Adiala jail in Rawalpindi from Attock jail in Punjab province
following the directives issued by the IHC. Last weekend, the police ramped up security in the vicinity of
the Adiala jail by deploying elite commandos and setting up additional security pickets to ensure
foolproof measures.
Khan, through senior lawyer Latif Khosa, on Thursday moved the IHC against the Toshakhana verdict
under section 561-A (saving of inherent power of high court) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the
Dawn newspaper reported.
The petition’s title stated that it sought “rectification of the order dated August 28 to the extent of
suspending the operation of the impugned order along with the sentence as verbally prayed by the
learned counsel for the petitioner before this honourable court at the time of arguments”.
On August 28, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) suspended Khan’s three-year sentence in the Toshakhana
case.
It urged the court to rectify the “omission of not recording the contention of the learned counsel for the
petitioner with regard to the suspension” of the Toshakhana judgment of August 5.
It further requested the IHC that the operation of the same order be “suspended/stayed till final
decision of the appeal”. The plea also sought permission to make the state a respondent in the memo of
appeal.
“Any other direction or relief which this honourable court deems fit and proper in the indication of
grievances aforesaid may also be awarded," it added.
The petition listed the Election Commission of Pakistan as a respondent in the case and stated that
during the course of the arguments, Khan’s counsel, Khosa, had “specifically requested” the IHC to
suspend the operation of the Toshakhana verdict as well as the sentence.
It argued that the language of section 426 (suspension of sentence pending appeals) was “very much
clear that the court seized with the matter has the power to suspend the impugned order and the
sentence”.
Citing section 561-A of the CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure), it said the IHC had the authority to issue
orders to “give effect to any order under the Code (CrPC) or to prevent abuse of process of any court or
otherwise to secure the ends of justice”.
The plea added that the omission of not the counsel’s contentions before the IHC when urging the
suspension of the August 5 trial court verdict and the “subsequent non-mentioning of the same” in the
IHC’s order of August 28 was “an omission floating on the face of the order”.
It contended that the omission of arguments has “caused serious prejudice to the rights” of the PTI chief
as he has been disqualified from contesting elections by the ECP.
It added that the ECP was “in haste in disqualifying the petition […] notwithstanding the fact that
conviction/sentence had not attained finality”.
The plea went on to mention “attempts being made to remove his (sic) from the head of the party and
even proceedings to take away the symbol and throw him out of the arena of general elections”.
“The entire leadership of PTI is either incarcerated or amongst the missing persons beside hundreds of
false cases registered against loyalists resulting in incarceration and unending ordeal,” it stated.
Meanwhile, the IHC issued notices to respondents on a plea of Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, wherein she
sought protection for her husband.
IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq presided over the hearing and issued notices to the respondents in the
case.
During the hearing, he observed, “If there is room for it and the court can do something, I will issue an
order accordingly.”
Khosa appeared as the counsel for Bushra Bibi and urged the court to grant permission to provide Khan
with home cooked food.
“Prayers can barely be offered in the cell where the PTI chairman has been kept,” he contended before
the court.
“It is our history that whoever becomes the president or prime minister, he later becomes a guest at the
Adiala and Attock jails,” Khosa said.
Subsequently, the court issued notices and adjourned the hearing until next week.
On Monday, Bushra Bibi approached the IHC seeking protection for her husband. She had expressed
the apprehension that the jail administration might poison the meal of her husband and sought
permission for homemade food for the detained PTI chief.
On Tuesday, Naeem Haider Panjutha, spokesman to Khan on legal affairs, had claimed that his client had
been moved to a lower-class cell at the Adiala Jail last night and feared the ex-premier’s life was in
danger.
Confirming that Bushra Bibi met Imran in Adiala Jail on Tuesday, he claimed there was “danger to Imran
Khan’s life”. “Imran can be slow food poisoned … he is being mentally tortured and his movement has
been restricted.”
Related Posts:
