HT Digital
Tuesday, October 8: In a recent meeting with Meghalaya Tourism Minister Paul Lyngdoh, the Meghalaya Rural Tourism Forum (MRTF) voiced strong opposition to a proposal put forth by the All Meghalaya Khasi Tourist Taxi Association (AMKTTA) to adopt the Sikkim model of tourism. The meeting, which took place in Shillong, was convened to discuss the implications of this proposal, which seeks to restrict the entry of Assam-registered tourist taxis into popular tourist destinations in Meghalaya.
The Sikkim tourism model, which the AMKTTA is pushing to implement in Meghalaya, prohibits the entry of all tourist taxis registered in Assam from accessing various tourist spots within Sikkim. This system, as argued by the AMKTTA, could benefit Meghalaya’s local tourist taxi operators by ensuring that only Meghalaya-registered vehicles can provide services within the state’s tourist hotspots. They believe this could protect the livelihoods of local taxi operators and prevent competition from vehicles registered outside the state.
However, the MRTF, led by its president Alan West Kharkongor, expressed deep concerns over the potential ramifications of adopting such a restrictive model. The forum firmly believes that implementing the Sikkim-style ban could lead to significant disruptions in Meghalaya’s tourism sector, which is a vital part of the state’s economy. Kharkongor highlighted that tourism in Meghalaya has long thrived on a principle of inclusivity, where tourist vehicles from Assam and other neighboring states have been welcomed across various locations without restriction.
During the meeting, the MRTF emphasized the importance of maintaining a balanced and open approach to tourism. They argued that closing off access to Assam-registered tourist taxis could create unintended consequences, not only for the flow of tourists into Meghalaya but also for the broader economic stability of the region. With Meghalaya’s close proximity to Assam, a significant portion of tourists entering the state rely on transportation services originating from Assam. Restricting these vehicles could result in a decline in tourist numbers, thereby impacting businesses across sectors, including hospitality, retail, and local transport.
The MRTF also pointed out that the longstanding practice of allowing equal access to all tourist vehicles has contributed to the steady growth of tourism in Meghalaya. They believe that this inclusive approach has fostered a sense of unity and collaboration between neighboring states, and it has helped create a positive image of Meghalaya as a tourist-friendly destination. Kharkongor argued that adopting a model that restricts access could damage the reputation of the state and lead to a decline in the overall tourist experience.
Additionally, the forum raised concerns about the potential logistical challenges that could arise if the ban were to be implemented. Given that many tourists rely on Assam-based transport services to visit popular spots in Meghalaya, the sudden restriction of these vehicles could create confusion and inconvenience for visitors. This, in turn, could lead to negative reviews and deter future tourists from choosing Meghalaya as their destination.
Tourism Minister Paul Lyngdoh, while acknowledging the concerns raised by the AMKTTA, assured the MRTF that the state government remains committed to maintaining an inclusive and open approach to tourism. He stated that the tradition of allowing tourist vehicles from Assam and other neighboring regions to access Meghalaya’s tourist spots would continue, as it has proven effective in promoting the state as a welcoming destination. The minister also emphasized the importance of collaboration between the tourism sector and local communities to ensure the sustainable growth of tourism in the state.
The MRTF expressed its appreciation for the minister’s support and reiterated its commitment to working alongside the government to promote a tourism model that benefits both local stakeholders and the broader economy. Kharkongor also stressed that any changes to the current tourism practices should be carefully considered and designed to enhance, rather than restrict, the flow of visitors into the state.
At the conclusion of the meeting, both the MRTF and the government agreed on the need for continued dialogue and cooperation in addressing the challenges faced by Meghalaya’s tourism sector. The MRTF emphasized that protecting the interests of local taxi operators is essential, but it must be done in a way that does not compromise the overall growth and development of the tourism industry.
While the AMKTTA’s concerns regarding competition from Assam-based tourist taxis were acknowledged, the MRTF and the government ultimately favored a more inclusive approach that ensures the long-term success of Meghalaya’s tourism industry. Moving forward, it is expected that the government will take a balanced approach, ensuring that both local taxi operators and the wider tourism economy can thrive without unnecessary restrictions.
This meeting has underscored the need for careful planning and coordination between the various stakeholders involved in the tourism industry. As Meghalaya continues to grow as a popular destination, finding solutions that promote sustainable and inclusive tourism will be key to ensuring the state’s continued economic prosperity.
